Questions
Q1: Why should we consider a PTFE cable alternative for existing and new system designs?
Q2: Up to now we have specified PTFE cables. What do we have to consider if we want to design-in ENVIROFLEX cables?
Q3: As the temperature rating of PTFE cables goes beyond that of ENVIROFLEX cables, which benefit ENVIROFLEX has in case of fire?
Q4: Are ENVIROFLEX cables just like RG-type cables, but with a halogen-free jacket?
Q5: The operating temperature of Polyethylen cables is generally limited up to +80°C. Why the temperature resistance of ENVIROFLEX is better?
Q6: Can the ENVIROFLEX cross-linked materials easier be decomposed than PTFE/FEP?
Q7: You're claiming that ENVIROFLEX cables are fully dimensionally compatible to industry standard RG-Type cables. For what reason we do find certain deviations comparing the data sheets?
Question (Q1): Why should we consider a
PTFE cable alternative for existing and new system designs?
Answer:
Industry standard RG-type PTFE/FEP bearing cables possess excellent overall characteristics. PTFE RF
cable costs are also remarkably higher versus PE based ones. But an UL temperature rating of 105°C (PE
based construction) still meets most customer needs. eg. inner conductor soldering).
With
regard to cost, the PTFE/FEP material and manufacturing process is relatively expensive. When the supply
and demand mechanisms are aggravated by allocated availability, PTFE cable costs rise excessively.
With
regard to flexibility, PTFE cable is relatively rigid. This is a characteristic of extruded PTFE, and
virtually nothing can be done to improve this physical property.
With regard to health
and safety, PTFE cables are halogen bearing cables. In the event of fire it can lead to the incineration
of the cable with a resultant release of toxic smoke.
With regard to being recyclable,
PTFE cables are particular resistant to decomposition, especially because of their excessive temperature
capability. As environmental responsibility regulations evolve to mandate that manufactures recycle
their products at the end of their service life, the true application cost of PTFE cables will reach
excessive levels.
Every manufacturer needs to be aware of new regulations and the products
and processes that will meet them. Early new product design-in is the best insurance against future
regulatory difficulties as world nations move toward more environmentally responsible end-life-product
recycling legislation. Companies that adopt the latest technology will also easily provide their customers
with the best balance of properties at the lowest possible price.
Question (Q2): Up to now we have specified
PTFE cables. What
do we have to consider if we want to design-in ENVIROFLEX cables?
Answer:
ENVIROFLEX cables offer significant advantages over PTFE/FEP bearing RG cables in situations where the
application temperature does not exceed 105°C. In most applications the excess thermal capability of
PTFE cable is of no utility, given that the associated circuit components unsolder at a temperature
that is substantially below the maximum useable temperature of the PTFE cable dielectric.
Being
the dimensional and electrical equivalent of an RG type cable, ENVIROFLEX cables can be easily designed
into existing RG type cable applications by merely considering the maximum temperature, power and frequency
requirements of the application.
Question (Q3): As the temperature rating
of PTFE cables goes
beyond that of ENVIROFLEX cables, which benefit ENVIROFLEX has in case of fire?
Answer:
Fire Safety is more important than ever. The plastic insulation material of standard RG cables contains
halogen, which will produce highly toxic and corrosive gasses when it is burnt. Fumes given off during
a fire can severely damage circuitry, and toxic smoke can cause human injury or death.
Careful
selection of ENVIROFLEX cable materials ensures that any emissions are of low toxicity, low smoke and
low flame generation.
Question (Q4): Are ENVIROFLEX cables just
like RG-type cables,
but with a halogen-free jacket?
Answer: No, better than that. SUHNER
ENVIROFLEX is a truly halogen free cable family. ENVIROFLEX utilizes not only halogen-free, low smoke
and fire retardant material for the jacket, but also for the dielectric. No halogen comprised components
like PTFE, FEP or PVC are involved, making the cables particularly interesting from a safety, as well
as an environmental point of view.
Question (Q5): The operating temperature
of Polyethylene cables
is generally limited up to +80°C. Why the temperature resistance of ENVIROFLEX is better?
Answer:
The Polyethylene dielectric and the RADOX® jacket of ENVIROFLEX are cross-linked to increase its chain
molecular stability and elevate thereby its maximum useable temperature by 25°C. This results in a maximum
specified operating temperature of +105°C.
The cross-molecular linkages of the material
enhances the physical stability, so that it will not begin to soften if it is heated during a solder
process.
Question (Q6): Can the ENVIROFLEX cross-linked
materials easier
be decomposed than PTFE?
Answer: One of the characteristics of PTFE
is an excellent temperature capability during its service life. It does not begin to soften until it
is heated above 327°C. On the other hand, this means that it will be very resistant to subsequent decomposition
when it is no longer needed. In addition, careful consideration must be given to the decompositional
byproducts of materials, so as to avoid health and safety hazards like that which results from the incineration
of halogen bearing plastics such as PTFE and FEP. The incineration of halogenated combustibles may produce
amounts of Carbonylfluorid, Perfluorisobutylen and Hydrofluoric acid that can result in increasing maintenance
cost.
Recyclable plastics used in ENVIROFLEX are molecularly altered to enhance their
physical properties without producing materials that substantially resist decomposition. The materials
are toxical harmless in accordance with the European Union safety specification-sheet 91/155/EWG.
Question (Q7): You're claiming that ENVIROFLEX
cables are fully
dimensionally compatible to industry standard RG-Type cables. For what reason we do find certain
deviations comparing the data sheets?
Answer: The ENVIROFLEX
cables were developed to be fully compatible to the existing international standards for RG 142 B/U,
RG 400 /U and RG 393 /U. An additional cable type was developed to meet the dimensions of the RG 316
/U, with the exception that it has a double braid for better screening. The PTFE equivalent is commonly
known as RD 316 (or K 02252 D in "HUBER+SUHNER language").
Due to manufacturing
requirements, we have to put up with a few minor dimensional deviations. However, those will have no
impact on compatibility, meaning that one can easily move to either cable type while using the same
industry standard connectors that are available from suppliers worldwide.